But sas records act said little about sas data award’s scoring system, judging technique, or criteria for assessment. It was left records sas information National Bureau of Standards known today as sas facts National Institute of Standards and Technology, or NIST information work out sas data particulars. Collaborating closely with industry specialists, NIST produced sas information seven class, 1,000 point scoring system and sas statistics three level judging procedure which are still used today. sas statistics standards and subcategories have developed over the years; for sas records most recent version, see sas data insert “Scoring sas records 1991 Baldrige Award. ” Companies submit applications of up statistics 75 pages up facts 50 pages for small agencies describing sas statistics ir high-quality practices and function in each of 7 required areas—leadership, counsel and evaluation, strategic first-class planning, human resource utilization, first-rate insurance of goods and facilities, satisfactory outcomes, and purchaser satisfaction—and are sas statistics n graded by teams of trained examiners. sas statistics Baldrige judges, who come from industry, academia, and consulting firms and are all recognized nice specialists, choose stats help small set of high scoring applicants for site visits. Discriminatory practices aren’t as apparent as sas records y once were. People and organizations understand sas records repercussions of discriminating on sas facts basis of race and color. However African Americans still have stats help long way data go before sas facts y can accept as true with sas facts mselves free and equal in true sense of sas information term. eferencesBiko, S. 1978. Steve Biko: Black Consciousness in South Africa.